Monday, January 26, 2015

The No-Restaurant Resolution

            Last night, as a belated birthday celebration following week too hectic for cake, I was treated to dinner at one of my favorite restaurants in my city, the SpringfieldGourmet Taco Company.
I love this place. The menu is wildly creative, and each bite is a little festival of flavor. The décor is fun—lots of black and red, film posters on the walls, neither a sombrero nor cactus in sight. I’m smitten with the cilantro tiger shrimp sriracha taco, with its grilled pineapple, feta, spinach, and cucumber.
My server, Ty, told me that they prepare all of the fresh ingredients each day, from the cilantro to the tiny minced pears to the white corn hominy salsa. They make their own chili sauce, four kinds of salsa for the chips, and six clever varieties of guacamole.
If I sound unusually excited about tacos, well, it’s because these are unusually good tacos—but also, this birthday meal happened to be my first restaurant meal in 2015.
My family made a joint resolution this year, and it was not to eat out in 2015, except for special occasions. A birthday, even a belated one, counts.
We’ve noticed myriad benefits to our no-restaurant plan. We’ve saved a ton of money. We’re more creative in the kitchen. Our food choices are more mindful. We direct more of our energy toward home and family. And, as evidenced by my birthday meal, the times we do eat out are much more memorable and special.
When we do eat out, it is our plan to dine at those places that do what we cannot. We could never fashion a curry blend to rival the flavors we find at the Taj Mahal restaurant. We might feel stymied by lemon grass, but they know just what to do with it at Thai Peppers. And I’m not about to mince pears into tiny quarter-inch squares—but I certainly enjoyed the little explosions of flavor on my tongue when I tasted them last night.

Maybe true innovation is best left to the professionals, but it has been satisfying to find that the home can be my family’s center of nourishment and sustenance.

Sunday, January 25, 2015

Murder With a Donut on the Side

            I love a simple murder.
            If I had a whole day stretched out in front of me—no kids, no deadlines, no papers to grade, and an opportunity to do nothing at all—I believe I would spend it reading a mystery novel cover to cover, in one sitting, not even breaking for lunch.
            And then I’d start another.
            When my literary friends ask me to name my favorite author, I demur. There are so many to choose from, I tell them, then cast my eyes upward, as if trying to choose from among Melville, Atwood, David Foster Wallace ….
            But as a point of fact, my favorite author ever to pick up the pen is the marvelously inventive Raymond Chandler, whose gritty knowingness was revealed in his masterful use of the simile:

She smelled the way the Taj Mahal looks by moonlight.

I'm an occasional drinker, the kind of guy who goes out for a beer and wakes up in Singapore with a full beard.

I felt like an amputated leg.

She gave me a smile I could feel in my hip pocket.

I belonged in Idle Valley like a pearl onion on a banana split.

On the dance floor half a dozen couples were throwing themselves around with the reckless abandon of a night watchman with arthritis.

The voice got as cool as a cafeteria dinner.

The voice that answered was fat. It wheezed softly, like the voice of a man who had just won a pie-eating contest.

From thirty feet away she looked like a lot of class.  From ten feet away she looked like something made up to be seen from thirty feet away.

I love the quality of the observation behind each simile, and this intelligence pervades whole novels—his entire oeuvre—even when figurative language is not in play.
            I also love Agatha Christie, and have equal fondness for her Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple novels. Christie offers clever and observant investigators and drops clues so that the reader has a chance to unravel the case in real time, unlike those authors who introduce details at the end that make the killer suddenly obvious.
            While this rare intelligence is my favorite aspect of the Chandler or Christie novel, I don’t demand it in all of my mystery reading. In fact, my favorite subgenre is, pardon the pun, the cheesiest there is: the culinary mystery.
            In the culinary mystery, the person who investigates murders has a day job in the food industry. She is a baker or a caterer or a cookie-shop owner or a donut-maker. She typically resides in a small town, one with an unnaturally high murder rate (sort of like Cabot Cove, Maine, where the 3,000 residents had about a one in four chance of being offed during the twelve-year run of Murder, She Wrote). And between the chapters, or at the end of the book, the author includes recipes. (If you’d like to “sample” a culinary mystery, try Diane Mott Davidson, Joanne Fluke, or Jessica Beck.)
            What doesn’t do it for me is a larger mystery—espionage or, worse, some supernatural source of evil. I like the ridiculous notion that someone can dispatch some Alpine/coastal/desert/tundra town’s community theater manager or mayor or volleyball coach, and the woman who runs the donut shop can track him or her down and make sure justice is served, maybe twenty times or more in the life of a series of novels. I don’t believe the donut-making detective exists. I can’t help but believe in the former—dangerous nations and pervasive evil—and I don’t find the thoughts of them at all enjoyable.
            There is much to be said for a simple murder. As a former reporter, I covered murder trials, and they were terrible—nothing simple about them. But the elimination of a two-dimensional character in a wholly unbelievable novel doesn’t bug me, and the knowledge that there will be comeuppance in 150 pages pleases me greatly.

            I’d read a silly mystery novel right now, in fact, but a child needs my attention, and this copyediting project isn’t going to finish itself. One of these days, though, I’m going to give in, lie down with an appealing mystery, and put out a “do not disturb” sign for the whole world—and right now that couch is looking about as inconspicuous as a tarantula on a slice of angel food.

Saturday, January 24, 2015

In Praise of the Writing Project

            So many of my poet friends go through long stretches where the poetry just doesn’t happen.
            I know the feeling. I had a stretch like that for, oh, a decade or so. As a result, I missed my poetic prime, and alas, there will be no younger poets award for me. (If I ever win Powerball, I hereby vow to start a poetry prize for poets who aren’t young. “Your boobs must be THIS LOW to enter,” I’ll advertise, with an accompanying diagram.)
            I digress. There are so many things that keep us from writing. People act shitty and it gets into our head. We work at a job that saps our time. We work at a family that denies us our comfort. We work at a life that dries up our creativity and initiative.
            I previously posted my theory that the answer to writer’s block is serious butt-work—sitting down and not getting up until something happens. (That’s a reasonable approach to constipation as well. And if you take a notebook with you, well—two birds.)
            But sitting isn’t the whole answer. The pen needs to move, or the fingertips, or some other word-writing appendage. And it’s hard to get to that point, because first it seems like there ought to be an idea.
            Or should there? For a long time I thought that I needed to approach the page with something in mind to write about. Otherwise, it’s possible to waste a whole lot of time trying to think of a viable subject.

            Lately, though, I’ve been waiting until bedtime to write, and in a desire to get something out of me for the day, I sit in my bed and look around for a starting point.
            The other night my cat came along, and I ended up with a pet poem. And on another occasion I heard a siren in my neighborhood, and it led me to a nifty poem about first responders. And recently my eyes lit upon an outfit that I had laid out for a job interview the next day. I really liked the poem I got out of that visual prompt, and it also filled my long minutes of nervous insomnia and Q&A rehearsal.
            What I’m working on now is a series of poems about “The Poet,” a version of my frantic daily self as seen through the eyes of my more contemplative poet self. It is the latest of a long line of poetry projects—a strategy I have employed for my entire writing life.
            In grad school I had a series about the Escaped Housewife, an exaggerated version of myself, I suppose, stuck and looking for adventure, and finding it in activities like playing the bagpipes, picking up hitchhikers, sprouting a penis, or taking a job as team mascot.
But the writing project doesn’t have to be a set of persona poems, of course. My most successful project was a series that combined a writing practice with regular meditation, and I set out to write a poem a day for one hundred days using a stone as a starting point. The stone was a river stone that I plucked out of a river in Montana just after I graduated from college. Rocks are a different color in Montana than they are in Ohio, and a rock that is pink or green or blue underwater quickly goes gray in the pocket. There is a lot to say about a rock like that.
Another series of mine combines suicide methods with Old Testament stories, and yet another takes the form of a guided meditation, relaxing the toes, foot, legs, and on up to the head and, just above it, the crown.
When you come to the page looking for inspiration, you can train yourself to find it in anything—in the paper or pen itself, in the chair, in the blank wall. But when you come to the page ready to pick up where you left off on a poetry project, you can set straight to work on the next installment.
There is a danger, of course. A poet with an eye toward a full-length book manuscript could find herself with a bunch of unrelated chapbooks instead. That’s a problem I face myself. I’ve solved it by publishing a couple of chapbooks and continuing to plug away at the work of poetry.

Time is the problem. We waste a bunch of it, and then it suddenly occurs to us that, wow, a lot of time has passed without us accomplishing much at all. The project is the palliative, but, I’m sorry to report, there is no cure.

Friday, January 23, 2015

A Life Devoted to Poultry—Ahem, POETRY

When covering farm news, it’s good to have some jeans and a pair of boots in the trunk of your car, because you never know what you might end up walking in.
I learned this from my agricultural beat predecessor, a woman raised in rural Ohio, and someone who knew the ins and outs of a working farm. While my own upbringing was also rural, my family lived in the woods and did not farm, aside from a rather mean goat and a copperhead-filled chicken house we maintained for a few years when I was growing up.
On the farm beat, one day you might cover a tragedy in a silo or a gravity wagon—both of which can pull a person’s body under the grain and smother him or her as rescuers make a futile attempt to fight the pull. On a brighter note, you might cover a new crop—my colleague knew of a secret field of peppermint, the location a closely kept secret because of the value of the harvest in an area mostly dedicated to corn, wheat, and soy.
The constant friction between family farms and large-scale egg or pork production facilities is another part of the farm reporter’s beat, and there is also the highlight of the year—the county fair and the winning entries in livestock, small animal, and even baking categories.
            My time as a reporter spanned the decade of the 1990s in the small town—practically a village—of Kenton, Ohio. I was also a poet, which at the time didn’t amount to much more than writing words in a notebook and trying to shuffle them around until they lined up as they should.
            Being a poet also involved reading. Every trip to the state capital, Columbus, I would buy journals, anthologies, whatever I could get my hands on that had poetry inside.
            My favorite book was by a poet named William Matthews, who was quite a famous poet, although that fact means very little in the broader, non-poetry world. Matthews wrote a book called Flood that really spoke to me as it chronicled what floodwaters did to a landscape. These flood poems felt relevant to what I was doing at the time as I covered the stories that seemed to alter the landscape of my community. I wrote about farm news, of course, but I also covered county government, heartbreaking court cases, and features about extraordinary people—because even in rural America, brutal monsters and awe-inspiring heroes walk among us.
            Matthews’ poetry moved me so much that I decided to track him down and write him a letter. Poets don’t get a lot of fan letters, although these days the big ones are probably drowning in unsolicited e-mails and Facebook friend requests.
            I don’t remember exactly what I wrote. It would not have been unlike me to use the word “love.” I know I told him what I did day in and day out, and also what I wanted to do—make poetry of my own. I closed by thanking him for inspiring me.
            Some weeks later, I checked my mail and found an unexpected postcard, its message handwritten in small, tidy black print. Yes—it was from Matthews.
            He had filled the blank side of the picture postcard with kind and gracious words. Although I’ve moved a few times since then and lost the postcard in the shuffle, I remember one sentence distinctly:

A reporter is to a small town what a poet is to the language.

The words may as well have been strung up before me in neon. Even now, they are seared on the back of my eyes.

            While Matthews praised the part of me that was stuck as a small-town reporter, I also saw in his analogy a glimpse of myself as a poet. Already, I knew that my feature stories had the power to move people like poetry could. Matthews’ postcard made me realize that what I had viewed as a deviation from my path as a poet was actually another step along it.
I have no doubt that in that line of text, Matthews was referencing the Modern poet William Carlos Williams, who famously said, “It is difficult to get the news from poems, yet men die miserably every day for lack of what is found there.” I was well acquainted with the intersection of difficulty and news. I had once covered the murder trial of a young man, small in stature, who had been beaten to death at a quarry. They pulled his body from the water and matched a boot print on his child-sized chest to the foot of one of his killers.
            I knew another kind of difficulty, too—the challenges posed by spreadsheets. Obfuscation surrounding a polluted landfill. The science in agricultural reporting. Journalism was nothing if not practice in sorting out complex things, in making sense of the world.
            Matthews’ little aphorism suggested something new to me—that I had in me the potential to offer readers a different kind of news in my poems. Maybe I was too busy being a watchdog of local government, and not busy enough being a watchdog of the spirit.
           
            Over the next few months, I applied to the two nearest creative writing graduate programs and was waitlisted by one (Ohio State University) and admitted into the other (Bowling Green State University). I began working evenings at a chicken restaurant to make some extra money, since I would be leaving a full-time job to pursue my new course of action.
            I also continued to report the news, but with a renewed sense of its possibilities. On one assignment, I remember approaching a large group of sandhill cranes (a “sedge” of cranes—that’s the collective term, the precise word for such a gathering). I snapped pictures and edged closer and closer, until some signal passed silently among the birds and they took flight together, right over my head, so close I could have reached up and touched a trailing leg.
            I also remember my very first feature story for the newspaper, about a woman who, though dying of cancer, set up what she called a love garden, where anyone could come and gather enough to eat. Evenings, she would sit up in bed, sunlight through the window turning everything golden, and she would look at her neat rows of beans and lettuce, and sow compassion until her very last day.
            Sometimes when the sports desk was short-handed, I would pitch in there and help out as best I could. On a few occasions, my job was to photograph a college basketball game, and this entailed sitting behind the net and pointing my camera at lanky athletes as they leaped toward the basket with the ball, just above me—sort of like those cranes taking flight.
            And some days, I would just photograph a farmer in his or her field to track the progress of the corn. “Knee-high by the Fourth of July” is the old saying; in practice, though, July corn can be eight to ten feet tall.
            My nights at the restaurant, I wore a different hat, or, more specifically, an apron. My usual role was to seat people and bring their drinks, and to bus their tables when they left. On Tuesdays and Saturdays, all-you-can-eat chicken nights, I had another responsibility: the chicken pass.
            My job these nights was to take a platter of broasted chicken throughout the dining room and distribute extra pieces. It was disconcerting at first as a young woman to be summoned to a table by a barked-out command, “Breast!” or “Thigh!” I got used to it, though. That didn’t mean it grew any less strange, or that I wouldn’t eventually write about it.
            One night a person I know came in—an affable fellow, someone I’d once interviewed for a story. He wasn’t particularly a friend—you don’t always make a lot of friends as a reporter, although in a small town, most people know your name.
            “I hear you’re heading off to college to study poultry,” the man said politely as he picked out a wing and a thigh.
            It struck me that this was farm country. Food, something so basic to human existence, was foremost in everyone’s mind in this place. From daily fluctuations in the price of a bushel of soy to the land application of waste from a massive chicken farm, this was the news. It was also, I had had come to understand, the poetry.
            I let the misunderstanding pass. “Yes, sir, I am,” I replied.
            “You’ll do fine,” he assured me.

            His words had the ring of a blessing, so I tucked them away exactly like an extravagant tip to spend later on something nice, just for me.