In the news
today, there is a story about a woman being bitten by a scorpion … while on an
airplane.
It strikes
me that life is occasionally like that. We’re fully focused on going from Point
A to Point B, in the woman’s case from LA to Alaska, when something unexpectedly
stops us in our path. Our plane never even gets off the ground; it turns around
and takes us back to the gate.
Once, on my
way to being a lifelong journalist, I was thrown off course by a creative
writing degree, which rerouted me from a decade-long job in a newsroom to a
career in higher education. It’s been a life of constant adjustment, because
despite the attitudes that journalists and professors should share, a
dedication to truth-seeking, the pressures inherent in today’s higher education
can defeat professors in their efforts.
Journalists
and professors are both on a quest for truth. For journalists, the focus is
daily truths. As a small-town reporter, I brought my readers the truth about
accidents and county government and school boards and people with problems or
with amazing stories to tell. As a faculty member, truth has been shakier, but
my students and I have searched for it together, in poems and essays and
stories—their consumption and their creation.
Where
journalism is concerned, we come to expect special interests to try to
interfere with the news. I remember many times at the newspaper office when a
politician or a business owner or a prominent citizen would storm in and insist
that we not publish something. I was proud of the fact that their arguments
never made a difference. We let the news lead the way, and we didn’t omit any
familiar name from the police blotter, the court reports, the breaking news, or
the other stories we tracked down.
Our commitment to fairness even
nailed me once when I was caught speeding in a corrupt little town in my
coverage area. It was a notorious speed trap, one of those places where the
speed limit drops a little prematurely and the police chief hides in an alley
to catch drivers unaware. I gritted my teeth as I typed my own name into the
traffic court reports, but I included it, and I cursed that officer as I did
so. In other words, I stayed the journalist’s course.
A strange thing happens when you
enter academia, though. When we are students, universities seem like places to
challenge our preconceived notions and dig out essential truths. We study
philosophy and literature to learn what we can about humanity; we study
political science to understand what drives governments; we study languages to
learn new ways of conceiving ideas. Science encourages us to posit ideas and
test them. Art tells us that we can, and must, continue to try to express
ourselves in new and challenging ways.
But when we join the professoriate,
what we get is not that dynamic student experience, writ even larger. Instead, administrators
minimize faculty contributions and marginalize our voices, and they try to
convince us that faculty are a problem of the university. We cost a lot. We
make life difficult for our students. We don’t work hard enough. Our best course
of action is to keep our heads down and not step out of line.
The effort that goes into keeping faculty mum is pretty substantial. At my old institution, non-tenure track
faculty (the instructors and lecturers without the rank of professor) made up a
large portion of faculty ranks, but it wasn’t until the end of my time there,
almost a hundred years into the life of the institution, that these faculty
members were granted a seat on the faculty senate. (I was privileged to
represent my colleagues in one of the first NTTF faculty senate seats, and I
made the most of the opportunity, speaking up for our rights and lending our
voice at every opportunity.)
At my current institution, we don’t
even have a faculty senate. We have full faculty meetings, where we get
together and listen to lengthy reports by administrators before voting on
agenda items that are presented to us by the administration. No one is elected;
no one feels special responsibility for one’s position or vote. We do the basic
work of reading support materials and voting our conscience, but there is
always a sense that someone else is in charge.
But faculty should be in charge of
the curricular life of institutions. They are the proper people to set the
academic course for a university, and they are a pivot point between the
students—the lifeblood of any institution—and the administrators, whose proper
job is to buy chalk and make sure the floors get swept. Faculty should have a
key role in choosing administrators, in administering a budget, in salary
decisions, and in determination of educational policies.
These days, the academic freedom of
faculty is threatened by job insecurity and the erosion of tenure. It is
threatened by a constant sense that the fiscal sky is falling. It is threatened
by an overreliance on ill-conceived evaluation instruments and administrative
dictates about classroom policy.
A faculty member tends to feel that
she would be safer to pipe down and toe the line than to do what academics have
done since Socrates and before: speak out, challenge authority, question
received knowledge, and create, whether in the laboratory or the studio.
These days I’m feeling a lot like
that woman on the plane. Something poisonous was hiding in a place where she
had every reason not to expect it. Who knows how the scorpion got on the plane?
Maybe it traveled in on someone’s suitcase. Maybe some malicious person planted
it there. But it ended up biting someone, forcing her to alter her course.
The good news about the woman on
the plane is that she was fine. After being checked out quickly by medical
personnel, she was back in flight, headed to her destination. The
scorpion—arguably also an innocent victim of this turn of events—was squashed
by flight attendants. The threat was eliminated—that threat, anyway. There is
always the potential for another.
Sometimes I think it’s a good idea,
when delayed and rerouted, to think about one’s destination, and to embrace a
temporary holdup as a chance to change our course. It shouldn’t be necessary
for something to bite us in the ass to remind us of where we need to be.
Politics and distrust. i wish I had some answers and solutions. I fear I would only share platitudes.
ReplyDeleteDistrust is a desirable natural state. It's when we start collaborating and trusting and owing and preferring that we begin to err.
DeleteHmm. Maybe I am a Pollyanna.
ReplyDeleteNaw! You're wise. Nothing bad about a collaborative spirit.
Delete